Common Sense in New Jersey?

Looks like someone else has figured it out too...and he's in government to boot. New Jersey in fact.

“With this growing level of scientific uncertainty, it makes no sense to enact a new set of economically damaging regulations prompted by the global warming hysteria of recent years.”

This was said by Assemblyman Michael Doherty. Go here for more. He even mentions the incredibly low sunspot numbers I've been talking about and their possible contribution to lower global temperatures.

Over the past year, the sun keeps getting less and less active. The average sunspot number for July 2008 was 0.5. The last time that happened was Feb. of 1954. My guess is that the month of August will be below 1 and for 2008-2010, we'll be looking at global average temperatures that are low enough that even the media will notice the discrepancy between global warming and reality.

We can only hope.

The EPA, fire, and government

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action."

This quote has been attributed to George Washington and it is very much applicable in this case. If you are interested in hearing about a horrible injustice in Driggs, Idaho, please read this article about a hard working, diligent man named Lynn Moses who went to prison for following the instructions of local government involving flood control. What happened to common sense in government? Oh yeah, government is like fire.

We hear again and again from the government that they want to pass some sort of law restricting our freedoms and while the law could be used to harass innocent people, we are told that it will only be used to go after the bad guys. That may be true for a year or two, but after a while, government forgets and starts using said law to solidify their own power or just to harass innocent civilians because they can. The story above represents an incredible miscarriage of justice. This didn't happen in California or New York City, but right here in Idaho. Please read it and prepare to be amazed.

When you combine that with the fact that over the past 7 years we have been adding about 1 federal crime per week, it is cause for concern. Read more about it here.

Then get on the horn and tell your congressmen to stop passing crime legislation at the federal level unless it is absolutely necessary. Otherwise we all run the risk of committing a federal crime.

Universal Health Care -- Not Good.

When you think of Universal Health Care, do you think of it as a good thing or a bad thing? It's a good thing in that it offers health care to those who otherwise could not afford it. It's a bad thing in that it taxes those who make money in order to provide extremely structured care to those who request it. By extremely structured care, I mean the "government plan" determines what benefits you can and can not receive and how those benefits are paid for.

My wife needs a certain kind of medication and must take a brand name version and the recommendation is to stick with one or the other. There are two brands that are essentially the same and cost the same if purchased without any kind of insurance. Lucky us, we have some insurance, however, medicare reimburses one type much more than the other. Our insurance company matches medicare, therefore, we are burdened with some of the same non-nonsensical requirements determined by Medicare. We can either pay twice the amount or make a non-recommended switch to the other brand. The pharmacy emphasized with us, but they are not able to get the insurance company to listen to anything approaching reason since it all goes back to what the government decides.

So, even with the system we have, things are screwed up from an economic/health perspective and currently the government has a fairly small role compared to providing "Universal Health Care".

But wait, it gets worse, much worse. The government already wants to control your actions in regards to recycling, burning, fireworks, car seats, and emissions testing to name a few. What happens when the government is paying for your health care? Then we get laws banning things like, eating too much, lack of exercise, driving instead of walking short distances, rationing of fats, etc.

Read this article from Reuters and you can see where it is going. Here is a short excerpt:

"The findings highlight a need for widespread efforts to improve Americans' lifestyles and keep their weight in check, according to the researchers. Simply telling people to eat less and exercise more is not enough, Liang noted.

Broader social changes are needed as well, she said -- such as making communities more pedestrian-friendly so that people can walk regularly, or getting the food industry to offer healthier, calorie-conscious choices."

If people wanted the food industry to offer healthier, calorie-conscious choices, the food industry would offer them. If people wanted to live in pedestrian-friendly communities, they would create them and live there.

Do we really want to encourage the government to be overly concerned about what we eat, where we live, and how much we exercise? If you are pro "Universal Health Care" that is exactly what you are encouraging.

Why is it such a problem to work for money and spend money on the things you want/need? Why must we run 40% of our income through the government so they can grudgingly parcel out 10% back to us if we jump through their series of hoops?

I'm a lot like the kid. He doesn't like hoops either.

Chickens or Ducks

We recently were given some chickens and are enjoying their ability to eat zucchini and lay eggs. The kid also likes to feed them and watch them eat. He sits on top of the enclosure and tosses handfuls of corn down to them. His previous exposure to winged animals has been a farm game on the fridge that involves a duck, a farm book about ducks, and the occasional duck that flies into our yard and hangs out for a bit.

For the last week, ever since the chickens arrived, the little bugger has been calling the chickens ducks. In the morning, first thing, he wants to go look at the ducks. When we drive into the driveway he wants to go see the ducks. After lunch, he wants to go see the ducks. Upon further questioning, since we don't have any ducks, he points towards the back door or directly at the chicken coop.

Time and again we let him know that they are really chickens and he still calls them ducks. He won't even say the word chicken. Hopefully he learns about chickens soon because its hard not to call them ducks when he is so persistent. Like many in our society, he thinks that if he truly believes that it is a duck then it will be a duck.

In case you were wondering, chickens like apples, zucchini, pork bones, zucchini casserole, cracked corn, and scratching up weeds. So far they have reduced 60 square feet of weeds to dust and are working on their next 60 square feet. What useful creatures!

Economic Justice

So, what do you think of when you hear the phrase "economic justice". Justice is a good thing, therefore economic justice is probably also a good thing?

Suffice to say, it is not. Economic justice is socialism. Time and time again we have seen from history that taxing the rich to provide for the poor encourages both groups to work less rather than more.

Why is this important? We have an opportunity in November to elect a socialist or a moderate. The socialist makes statements like,

"I've been working my entire adult life to help build an America where economic justice is being served,"

A wonderful article about this can be found at ibdeditorials.com. Please read it and learn a bit more about the desires of the most liberal senator in the Senate who desires to become president.

As a side note, the moderate isn't much to get excited about either, but at least he has enough sense not to accidentally do something catastrophic to our great nation.